Need Help With Critical Commentary?
I need a little help with Critical Commentary of charles dickens a walk in a workhouse. I was given the following piece and i am not too sure what Critical Commentary is
could anyone please give me a few ideas what to write ?
Among this congregation, were some evil-looking young women, and beetle-browed young men; but not many – perhaps that kind of characters kept away. Generally, the faces (those of the children excepted) were depressed and subdued, and wanted colour. Aged people were there, in every variety. Mumbling, blear-eyed, spectacled, stupid, deaf, lame; vacantly winking in the gleams of sun that now and then crept in through the open doors, from the paved yard; shading their listening ears, or blinking eyes, with their withered hands; poring over their books, leering at nothing, going to sleep, crouching and drooping in corners. There were weird old women, all skeleton within, all bonnet and cloak without, continually wiping their eyes with dirty dusters of pocket- handkerchiefs; and there were ugly old crones, both male and female, with a ghastly kind of contentment upon them which was not at all comforting to see. Upon the whole, it was the dragon, Pauperism, in a very weak and impotent condition; toothless, fangless, drawing his breath heavily enough, and hardly worth chaining up.
When the service was over, I walked with the humane and conscientious gentleman whose duty it was to take that walk, that Sunday morning, through the little world of poverty enclosed within the workhouse walls. It was inhabited by a population of some fifteen hundred or two thousand paupers, ranging from the infant newly born or not yet come into the pauper world, to the old man dying on his bed.
In a room opening from a squalid yard, where a number of listless women were lounging to and fro, trying to get warm in the ineffectual sunshine of the tardy May morning – in the ‘Itch Ward,’ not to compromise the truth – a woman such as HOGARTH has often drawn, was hurriedly getting on her gown before a dusty fire. She was the nurse, or wardswoman, of that insalubrious department – herself a pauper – flabby, raw-boned, untidy – unpromising and coarse of aspect as need be. But, on being spoken to about the patients whom she had in charge, she turned round, with her shabby gown half on, half off, and fell a crying with all her might. Not for show, not querulously, not in any mawkish sentiment, but in the deep grief and affliction of her heart; turning away her dishevelled head: sobbing most bitterly, wringing her hands, and letting fall abundance of great tears, that choked her utterance. What was the matter with the nurse of the itch-ward? Oh, ‘the dropped child’ was dead! Oh, the child that was found in the street, and she had brought up ever since, had died an hour ago, and see where the little creature lay, beneath this cloth! The dear, the pretty dear!
The dropped child seemed too small and poor a thing for Death to be in earnest with, but Death had taken it; and already its diminutive form was neatly washed, composed, and stretched as if in sleep upon a box. I thought I heard a voice from Heaven saying, It shall be well for thee, O nurse of the itch-ward, when some less gentle pauper does those offices to thy cold form, that such as the dropped child are the angels who behold my Father’s face!
You need to read the piece carefully and analyse it – how does Dickens engage the reader, note the use of the first person. Also the language and adjectives used.
Note how Dickens personalizes (personifies) Pauperism as the Dragon – allowing the use of metaphors to convey the horror. death similarly personified (though not quite how Terry Pratchett would do him). Note the reference to chaining up – poverty was a crime in those days.
He alludes to Hogarth, the artist who depicts various ‘progresses’ of Victorian Life – find out about him if you don’t know already.
Note how hew depicts the lack of light in the workhouse (they were pretty gloomy places – oh, yes they still exist – often incorporated in hospitals) – just a few telling phrases.
The piece involves pathos – the rather forced final paragraph for example more reflective than the instinctive thoughts of the actual moment as he is suggesting.
You need to read the piece carefully and analyse it – how does Dickens engage the reader, note the use of the first person. Also the language and adjectives used.
Note how Dickens personalizes (personifies) Pauperism as the Dragon – allowing the use of metaphors to convey the horror. death similarly personified (though not quite how Terry Pratchett would do him). Note the reference to chaining up – poverty was a crime in those days.
He alludes to Hogarth, the artist who depicts various ‘progresses’ of Victorian Life – find out about him if you don’t know already.
Note how hew depicts the lack of light in the workhouse (they were pretty gloomy places – oh, yes they still exist – often incorporated in hospitals) – just a few telling phrases.
The piece involves pathos – the rather forced final paragraph for example more reflective than the instinctive thoughts of the actual moment as he is suggesting.
References :